This painting shows a group of Native Americans from various
tribes, gathered in perhaps the white house in Washington D.C, addressing the
President of the United States (Andrew Johnson?). The Native Americans are
dressed in traditional outfits which although the image is black and white we
can see still contrasts sharply with the society dress of the whites in
attendance. What I find interesting is that for what many described the Natives
to be ‘primitive’ and ‘uneducated’ this painting shows a very cultured and diplomatic
consultation in which the natives seem to be trying to negotiate with those
that have simply taken over their native land, without any consideration or
permission. Thus this painting almost seems ironic and very ignorant of
Americans. Its subject is thought to be the Indians of North America negotiating
land possession in the 1860-70’s. As we know many tribes were forced to make
agreements/treaties with Government, in order to protect the future of their tribes,
and protect their homes etc. The very fact that in the picture the natives are
heavily outnumbered by the whites, echo’s the future of their existence and the
arrogance in the way the president and other whites in attendance are
gathered/ standing emphasizes their ignorance to the damage they caused to the
Natives. The picture was originally featured in Harper’s weekly Magazine ‘the
journal of Civilisation’, on March 17, 1867. And I felt was a true reflection
of the mass annihilation of the Native Americans during the settlement period.
A useful example Jodie. Your commentary could have been improved by beginning with the contextual information, which you could then build on more. For example, who would be the target audience for Harpers? How might this impact on the kind of images used in the magazine (think ideology here)? You are beginnint to think about what the image might suggest but I am confident you can push this further.
ReplyDelete